As a follow up to my earlier blog post, Are private companies worth more than public companies?, The New York Times Dealbook provides a worthwhile visualization and commentary on the growing valuation of some of today’s private high technology stocks vs. the public companies at the cusp of the 2000 meltdown. As cited in the article, Investing Like It's 1999, five private companies today are worth the same $71 billion as 24 public companies in 1999.
John Garrow

As a vice president of Newport Private Wealth, John Garrow focuses on the corporate finance needs of the firm’s entrepreneurial clients. These activities typically include capital raising, business sales and acquisitions and advisory work. His client base includes organizations across a diverse spectrum of growth stages and industries and includes both private and public companies.
Prior to joining Newport Private Wealth, John spent 11 years with RBC Capital Markets. His responsibilities included acting as co-head of the financial institutions group, several years in the firm’s Calgary office and positions in the debt capital markets and financial products groups.
John worked at Price Waterhouse and, over his six years with that firm, audited several of Canada’s largest private and public companies in a variety of industries with his final year in the consulting practice. He received a B.Sc., from the University of Toronto and an MBA from the University of Western Ontario.
John can be reached by email at jgarrow@newportprivatewealth.ca.
As a young investment banker, I was taught early on in my career that private companies are worth less than similarly sized, similarly profitable and similarly growing public companies. This was largely due to the lack of liquidity associated with private companies. Now, one of my bedrock beliefs is being challenged.
Today's piece by Jay Goltz,entrepreneur and small business columnist, on what he views to be the Top 10 Reasons for Entrepreneurial Success is especially good and, I thought, worth sharing.
The New York Times Small Business section is usually a worthwhile read.
With the apparent resurgence in the IPO market, it seemed timely to revisit my last blog What to know before you IPO and ask, "what's changed?"
After doing a little digging, it seemed to me there are several points worth making, which haven't really been front and centre in the popular press. Namely:
- Yes, the IPO market has recovered from the depressed levels of past years, but it's still at low levels;
- The markets appear to be primarily focused on revenues and less so on earnings;
- High valuation levels being accorded IPOs is at least one of the driving factors of this resurgence and there is a growing gap between valuation of revenues and profits that should provide a cautionary note for investors.
Last weekend, I finished reading Rod McQueen's "BlackBerry: The Inside Story of Research in Motion" and thoroughly enjoyed it. It got me thinking about one area devoted relatively little space in the book - the entrepreneur's decision to go public.
Now, in 300 pages recounting the 25 year history of perhaps Canada's most successful technology company, you may figure 20 pages is sufficient to devote to the issue of going public. For the record, Research In Motion (RIM) completed a private placement of $34 million to institutional investors in June 1996 (12 years after Mike Lazaridis had started the company) and then completed a full blown IPO in October 1997.




